Friday, December 27, 2019
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Essay about The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment is a legal procedure in which a state executes a person for crimes he/she has committed. This punishment has been implemented by many states, and is normally used for atrocious crimes, especially murder. It is also used on crimes against the state such as treason, crimes against humanity, espionage, and violent crimes while other states use it as part of military justice. There are mixed reactions on capital punishment depending on oneââ¬â¢s faith, and the state they come from. In my view, I am not in favor of death penalty, as I strongly believe that, death penalty is unacceptable and an inhumane practice for it denies one the right to live. Death penalty does not deter crime, it is an actâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Even though supporters argue that death penalty is a relief to the family of a person who was murdered by the convicted criminal; it is not true, their pain cannot be healed through the retribution or vengeance by death penalty. Therefore, killing a criminal cannot overcome a crime nor bring back the life of the person who was killed by the person convicted of murder. Death penalty sends a bad message to the society. The people in the society are made to believe that human life has no value, and when one commits a heinous crime like murder, they deserve to die. This is a bad message to the society because, the society should be taught to respect each others life and that every individual has a right to life. A humane society does not kill or support the killing of their fellow human beings, therefore, capital punishment is a violent homicide that teaches the society the permissibility of killing in order to solve social issues, and this is a bad sign. Hence, death penalty should not be allowed because it is the worst example to the society. Death penalty should be scrapped because it can lead to the execution of innocent people. The justice system is bound to make mistakes and so, the accused people should be given a chance to appeal, and prove their innocence other than being murdered because of mistakes made by judges. There are many cases whereby individuals are imprisoned andShow MoreRelatedThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished1192 Words à |à 5 PagesNo Death Penalty Capital crime is something that is meant for people that are found guilty of committing a serious crime, such as murder, rape, or theft. These are offences that should not be taken lightly but by killing the offender, the government is carrying about the action that they are trying to prevent. Also, the wrong person may be sentenced to death. After this person is executed, there is obviously nothing that can be done for the terrible mistake to be reversed. The death penalty shouldRead MoreShould The Death Penalty Be Abolished?. The Death Penalty982 Words à |à 4 PagesShould the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty is a ââ¬Å"term that applies to capital punishment and is the worst penalty given for committing a murder or an atrocious assault.â⬠(Black s Law Dictionary). Death penalty has been a part of human society and is legally approved for centuries. The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. Death sentencesRead MoreShould The Death Penalty Be Abolished?1925 Words à |à 8 Pages Abstract This paper explores five published articles that report on discussion on the very old and yet to answer question of whether the death penalty in the USA should be abolished? The articles, however, vary in their stand on death penalty. In all article it is very different on publisher stand. They discuss thing argument with their own way and vision of thinking. Adina Nicoleta (2011) has raised question for fair trial on the proceeding of the criminal cases. In other article Maestro MarcelloRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished1534 Words à |à 7 PagesIntro The death penalty gives humans in our legal system rights to decide who deserves to live, a power only God should possess. Capital Punishment takes away our rights as equals. From its origins, the death penalty has been an inhumane, costly, ineffective, and biased form of punishment that needs to be abolished granting everyone their right to live. History of the Death Penalty Down through history, the death penalty has been adapted to be justifiable in the eyes of the people. By alteringRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished1523 Words à |à 7 Pagescriminals has been performed by nearly every society to date. The death penalty came to the Americas when European settlers brought the idea of capitol punishment from Britain. The ideology behind taking someoneââ¬â¢s life for crimes they have committed is a simple one. If a person commits a hennas crime such as murder or rape, they shall receive the death penalty. In more recent times we now see many countries abolishing the death penalty. The trend suggests that the capitol punishment policies still implementedRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished1306 Words à |à 6 Pageschanged since the 17th century, so why not the age old penalty of death? Capital punishment in the United States is a highly debated topic. Arguments that want to get rid of this method of punishment usually mention th e many problems that capital punishment is plagued with. The death penalty has many issues that cannot be resolved, and since these issues canââ¬â¢t be solved, the death penalty should be abolished. ââ¬Å"The irrevocable nature of the death penalty renders it an unsustainable and indefensible remedyRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished1440 Words à |à 6 PagesThe death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States. It is implemented for the purpose of providing safety to the community and bringing justice to victims and their families. The death penalty is legal in thirty-one states (ââ¬Å"31 Statesâ⬠), and there are over forty different types of federal capital crimes that are eligible for the death penalty. These include crimes such as treason and kidnapping that results in murder (ââ¬Å"41 Federalâ⬠). However, many argue whether the death penalty isRead MoreThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished968 Words à |à 4 PagesEvery year, thousands of lives are legally taken under the death penalty. Why should we take more lives than the ones that have already been taken? The death penalty is the punishment of execution, carried out legally against an individual convicted of a capital crime. Its proponents argue that the death penalty deters other criminals who may intend to commit similar crimes in the future. However, there is little statistical evidence to support this claim. Also, execution eliminates the criminalRead MoreShould The Death Penalty Be Abolished?1350 Words à |à 6 PagesShould the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty, also known as capital punishment is a legal procedure in which a state executes a person for crimes he/she has committed. This punishment has been used by many states, and is normally used for serious crimes, especially murder. It is also used on crimes against the state such as treason, crimes against humanity, espionage, and violent crimes while other states use it as part of military justice. There are mixed reactions on capital punishmentRead MoreShould The Death Penalty Be Abolished?1443 Words à |à 6 Pages 6 Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished in the United States? Adalynne Francis CRJU 1000 Dr. Huss November 14, 14 Should capital punishment/ death penalty be abolished in the United States? Many feel that the death penalty is immoral and question whether the state and federal government deserve the right to kill those whom it has imprisoned. On the other hand, those opposed feel that by not acting upon the death penalty communities would plunge in anarchy and that by
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Dissabiliteis Essay Example For Students
Dissabiliteis Essay INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIESARTICLE I For the purposes of this Convention, the following terms are defined: 1. Disability The term disability means a physical, mental, or sensory impairment, whether permanent or temporary, that limits the capacity to perform one or more essential activities of daily life, and which can be caused or aggravated by the economic and social environment. 2. Discrimination against persons with disabilities a) The term discrimination against persons with disabilities means any distinction, exclusion, or restriction based on a disability, record of disability, condition resulting from a previous disability, or perception of disability, whether present or past, which has the effect or objective of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment, or exercise by a person with a disability of his or her human rights and fundamental freedoms. b) A distinction or preference adopted by a state party to promote the social integration or personal development of persons with disabilities does not constitute discrimination provided that the distinction or preference does not in itself limit the right of persons with disabilities to equality and that individuals with disabilities are not forced to accept such distinction or preference. If, under a states internal law, a person can be declared legally incompetent, when necessary and appropriate for his or her well-being, such declaration does not constitute discrimination. ARTICLE II The objectives of this Convention are to prevent and eliminate all forms of discrimination against persons with disabilities and to promote their full integration into society. ARTICLE III To achieve the objectives of this Convention, the states parties undertake: 1. To adopt the legislative, social, educational, labor-related, or any other measures needed to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities and to promote their full integration into society, including, but not limited to: a) Measures to eliminate discrimination gradually and to promote integration by government authorities and/or private entities in providing or making available goods, services, facilities, programs, and activities such as employment, transportation, communications, housing, recreation, education, sports, law enforcement and administration of justice, and political and administrative activities; b) Measures to ensure that new buildings, vehicles, and facilities constructed or manufactured within their respective territories facilitate transportation, communications, and access by persons with disabilities; c) Measures to eliminate, to the extent possible, architectural, transportation, and communication obstacles to facilitate access and use by persons with disabilities; and d) Measures to ensure that persons responsible for applying this Convention and domestic law in this area are trained to do so. 2. To work on a prior ity basis in the following areas: a) Prevention of all forms of preventable disabilities; b) Early detection and intervention, treatment, rehabilitation, education, job training, and the provision of comprehensive services to ensure the optimal level of independence and quality of life for persons with disabilities; and c) Increasing of public awareness through educational campaigns aimed at eliminating prejudices, stereotypes, and other attitudes that jeopardize the right of persons to live as equals, thus promoting respect for and coexistence with persons with disabilities; ARTICLE IV To achieve the objectives of this Convention, the states parties undertake to: 1. Cooperate with one another in helping to prevent and eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities; 2. Collaborate effectively in: a) Scientific and technological research related to the prevention of disabilities and to the treatment, rehabilitation, and integration into society of persons with disabilitie s; and b) The development of means and resources designed to facilitate or promote the independence, self-sufficiency, and total integration into society of persons with disabilities, under conditions of equality. ARTICLE V 1. To the extent that it is consistent with their respective internal laws, the states parties shall promote participation by representatives of organizations of persons with disabilities, nongovernmental organizations working in this area, or, if such organizations do not exist, persons with disabilities, in the development, execution, and evaluation of measures and policies to implement this Convention. 2. The states parties shall create effective communication channels to disseminate among the public and private organizations working with persons with disabilities the normative and juridical advances that may be achieved in order to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities. ARTICLE VI 1. To follow up on the commitments undertaken in this Conv ention, a Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities, composed of one representative appointed by each state party, shall be established. 2. The committee shall hold its first meeting within the 90 days following the deposit of the 11th instrument of ratification. Said meeting shall be convened by the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States and shall be held at the Organizations headquarters, unless a state party offers to host it. 3. At the first meeting, the states parties undertake to submit a report to the Secretary General of the Organization for transmission to the Committee so that it may be examined and reviewed. Thereafter, reports shall be submitted every four years. 4. The reports prepared under the previous paragraph shall include information on measures adopted by the member states pursuant to this Convention and on any progress made by the states parties in eliminating all forms of discrimination ag ainst persons with disabilities. The reports shall indicate any circumstances or difficulties affecting the degree of fulfillment of the obligations arising from this Convention. 5. The Committee shall be the forum for assessment of progress made in the application of the Convention and for the exchange of experience among the states parties. The reports prepared by the committee shall reflect the deliberations; shall include information on any measures adopted by the states parties pursuant to this Convention, on any progress they have made in eliminating all forms of discrimination against persons with disabilities, and on any circumstances or difficulties they have encountered in the implementation of the Convention; and shall include the committees conclusions, its observations, and its general suggestions for the gradual fulfillment of the Convention. 6. The committee shall draft its rules of procedure and adopt them by a simple majority. 7. The Secretary General shall provide the Committee with the support it requires in order to perform its functions. ARTICLE VII No provision of this Convention shall be interpreted as restricting, or permitting the restriction by states parties of the enjoyment of the rights of persons with disabilities recognized by customary international law or the international instruments by which a particular state party is bound. ARTICLE VIII 1. This Convention shall be open for signature by all member states in Guatemala City, Guatemala, on June 8, 1999, and, thereafter, shall remain open for signature by all states at the headquarters of the Organization of American States, until its entry into force. 2. This Convention is subject to ratification. 3. This Convention shall enter into force for the ratifying states on the 30th day following the date of deposit of the sixth instrument of ratification by a member state of the Organization of American States. .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 , .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .postImageUrl , .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 , .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:hover , .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:visited , .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:active { border:0!important; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:active , .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0 .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2a5cd7c98f68c1f35a27322e5088fba0:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Starwars Essay ARTICLE IX After its entry into force, this Convention shall be open for accession by all states that have not signed it. ARTICLE X 1. The instruments of ratification and accession shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. 2. For each state that ratifies or accedes to the Convention after the sixth instrument of ratification has been deposited, the Convention shall enter into force on the 30th day following deposit by that state of its instrument of ratification or accession. ARTICLE XI 1. Any state party may make proposals for amendment of this Convention. Said proposals shall be submitted to the General Secretariat of the OAS for dissemination to the states parties. 2. Amendments shall enter into force for the states ratifying them on the date of deposit of the respective instruments of ratification by two thirds of the member states. For the remaining states parties, they shall enter into force on the date of deposit of their respective instruments of ratification. ARTICLE XII The states may enter reservations to this Convention when ratifying or acceding to it, provided that such reservations are not incompatible with the aim and purpose of the Convention and relate to one or more specific provisions thereof. ARTICLE XIII This Convention shall remain in force indefinitely, but any state party may denounce it. The instrument of denunciation shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. The Convention shall cease to have force and effect for the denouncing state one year after the date of deposit of the instrument of denunciation, and shall remain in force for the other states parties. Such denunciation shall not exempt the state party from the obligations imposed upon it under this Convention in respect of any action or omission prior to the date on which the denunciation takes effect. ARTICLE XIV 1. The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, which shall send a certified copy thereof to the United Nations Secretariat for registration and publication pursuant to Article 102 of the United Nations Charter. 2. The General Secretariat of the Organization of American States shall notify the member states of that Organization and the states that have acceded to the Convention of the signatures, deposits of instruments of ratification, accession, and denunciation, and any reservations entered.
Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Stanford University Metaphysics Research Library an Example by
Stanford University Metaphysics Research Library Stanford University Metaphysics Research Library stated that Charles Sanders Pierce was born in the year 1839 at Cambridge Massachusetts (Charles Sanders Pierce). The records about his death mentioned that he died in the year 1914 at Milford, Pennsylvania (Charles Sanders Pierce). He lived as a writer for a total of 57 years. He had 80,000 known unpublished manuscripts and 12, 000 printed writings (Charles Sanders Pierce). There are two extremes of Pierces writings. The subjects of which he had written immensely talks about mathematics and physical science at a different extreme and economics to the social sciences in opposite side (Charles Sanders Pierce). Need essay sample on "Stanford University Metaphysics Research Library" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed The father of Charles was the one who greatly influenced his works. His father was a professor at Harvard University (Charles Sanders Pierce). His father was also one of the authors or founders of U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey and Smithsonian Institution (Charles Sanders Pierce). Charles Sanders Pierce always received intellectual encouragement of his father. As such, he was trained by his father in so many ways that he gained a kind of thinking that is related to solving scientific problems and philosophical challenges. Pierce studied in Harvard University and graduated in the year 1859 (Charles Sanders Pierce). His degree is on Chemistry in the year 1863. Later on, he worked asked a geodetic surveyor and investigator at U.S. Coast Geodetic Survey. Pierce has also another job and that is teaching logic at Johns Hopkins University. The life of Pierce was affected by cohabiting with a Gypsy wife. He started to experience hardships at this time. His academic job was terminated in the year1891 due to funding objections given by Congress. After all this time, Pierce experienced financial constraints and only survived due to the help of his friend William James (Charles Sanders Pierce). The writings of Pierce was scattered in all forms of sources. It is however hard to collect his writings due to the fact that it was immensely scattered in all publication media (Charles Sanders Pierce). After the death of Charles Sanders Pierce, his widow was able to sell his manuscripts to Harvard University. However, the papers were not properly taken cared of after the World War I (Charles Sanders Pierce). Even so, the writings of Pierce were located with all the things that he contributed to philosophy. Pierce was considered as an important person in the history of philosophical thought because he contributed many writings related to it. He was also considered as talented. At the year 1851, he was first exposed to the study of logic. He was able to absorb a textbook on logic by a certain author. So then, he started to think that all problems involved logic to be solved by a person. His fascination to logic resulted in this condition. At the start of the year 1860 up to his death, Pierce output on logic was ample enough and in a variety (Charles Sanders Pierce). At that time, he was also considered as a well-known logician. It is important for Pierce to be able to write about logic since it made him contribute to the academe on that subject. The people who were able to familiarize his works consider him as one of the great logicians of his time. He was influenced by the works of Ernst Schroeder, Bishop Richard Whately, Schiller, and Kant as well as of his father (Charles Sanders Pierce). Most of the people who studied logic were influenced on the writings of Kant. He was able to analytically study the works of Schiller and Kant (Charles Sanders Pierce). The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy had written about a particular work of Pierce and that is entitled C. S. Pierces Architectonic Philosophy. In this paper, we are going to summarize the aforementioned writing. Human knowledge is the main consideration in this writing. There is a need to classify all human knowledge and explain the relationship of each one of them. This thought of Pierce was actually derived from Kant (The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 1). Besides, this work was considered by him as the most important intellectual contribution in his entire life. There were many important passages in this work of Pierce. With respect to the architectonic system, he started this work by organizing human knowledge (The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 1). The area oh human knowledge that he focused was on science which was a broad subject. As a result, he counted the area on art, history and even biographical study as science. For him, philosophy is a formal science of discovery (The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 1). As such, Charles Sanders Pierce was able to make a hierarchical structure of the subject philosophy. The said structure is as follows: Mathematics Philosophy which consists of: Phenomenology Normative Science which consists of: Aesthetics Ethics Logic which consists of: Philosophical grammar Critical Logic Methodeutic Metaphysics 3. Physical Science Figure 1: (The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 1) http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/Peirce Ar.htm. The very foundation of this structure is to create a connection on all of mans ideas. Pierce simply wants to include himself and the way he organizes his ideas. Although this structure was considered as like an abstract simplifying relation of sciences, it is also a vital tool in organizing scientific theories (The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 1). The structure speaks of itself on how Pierce regarded the different disciplines. Mathematics is considered by him as superior over Philosophy down to the lowest level. Aside from that, Pierce also focused his explanation on the importance of philosophy. For him, the main facet of the subject is general principle suggesting emotional standards of a person which can be manipulated by sound (The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 1). It is interplay of sad music or joyful one being played by the musician. Hence, general principles of human emotion rest on reality. Yet, mathematics is still the central and superior subject of this writing by Pierce. It is very interesting to study the life of Charles Sanders Pierce. Personally, I am inclined to discuss some issues about him. First, let me talk about the issue of the influence his father had given him in matters of intellectual development. It was the best his father had given him. Being a professor in Harvard University, the things that Pierce father learned on that situation are vital to the intellectual development of Pierce regarding philosophy and mathematics. In fact, it is not surprising that the work of Pierce was the same with that of is father as a geodetic surveyor. Second, Pierce interest in the studying is undeniable and enviable. Only a few people are always interested in the study of mathematics and philosophy. But for Pierce, it was as if it is part of his very life. At a young age, Pierce also developed that love of books pertaining to those subjects. He even studied the book of Whates and was able to absorb it at a young age. He is also a hardworking unselfish thinker who used to serve his country. Although he experienced financial hardship while he lives his life, he was considered as one of the greatest logician at the time. The third reason why I chose this philosopher is because of his innate ability to deeply study and understand mathematics and philosophy. His philosophical structure of different disciplines is a hint that he is an organized person. The organization of his ideas is unique and it was never boring. It largely contributed to the academe especially in the area of reasoning. It is also obvious that Pierce is good in organization of ideas. His writings were never difficult to understand. The influence that he got from the writings of Kant and other thinkers helped him develop his own principles. He was never a sloppy learner since he studied a lot. It was also good that his writings reached the Harvard University. It was a chance that his works can be collected and used even up to now. Lastly, I personally agree with all the ideas of Pierce. His title as the most original intellectual had remained uncontested nowadays (Charles S. Pierce 1). He lived his life in accordance to his passion which is mathematics and philosophy. Aside from that, I agree that Piecre is also the premiere American writer who gained international fame (Pe 1) However, I am also affected on the fact that the saddest part of the life of Pierce was when his personal life had become unstable (Charles Sanders Piecre). Yet, I know that he was still considered as the founder of philosophical pragmatism (Halton 1). Essentially, I would like to apply the idea of organization in my life. The way Pierce managed to organize his knowledge is good. Lastly, my studies in different intellectual disciplines are also structured in such a way that it could be easy to remember, follow and understand. I am also applying his principles on pragmatism since it is a good guide in studying different subjects. All in all, Charles Pierce Sanders is a good influence in my life as well as in my studies since I learned a lot from his experience in living his life. Works Cited Charles Sanders Pierce. 2008. University of Stanford Metaphysics Research Library. 13 August 2008 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce/> C. S. Peirces Architectonic Philosophy. (2008). The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Charles Pierce. (2008). Pierce Organization. 13 August 2008 http://www.peirce.org/ > Charles Sanders Peirce. (2008). Philosophy Pages. Pe. (2008). Marxists Organization.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)